NYSID Posts Filing Guidance for EIAs under New Law

The NYSID has posted Filing Guidance for equity indexed annuities on its website, now that changes have been made to the nonforfeiture law to specifically address these products.  Most important is the explicit prohibition against using the CL6 certification process for these filings.  Properly marked, the Department states that submissions will be given priority in the prior approval queue.  

Because the "Deemer" process is statutorily mandated, it remains available.  It is worth noting that this guidance indicates that deemer filings "will be handled within the time frames specified by statute."  This may be a filing strategy worth seriously considering because experience has shown that priority given innovative product submissions often does not result in a very speedy review.   If EIAs move at a similar pace, the statutory time frames of the deemer law may be an attractive alternative and yet still result in a full review prior to marketing the product. 

In addition to this guidance, the Department has provided an important warning in preparing these submissions to which companies will want to pay close attention.  NY's new law (which will be effective October 8, 2008) requires submission of a demonstration that the present value of the possible 1% reduction in the guaranteed minimum interest rate does not exceed the market value of the benefit.  The Department notes here that the Memorandum of Variable Material (where some companies have placed their GMIR procedures under the current nonforfeiture law) is a publicly available document. If your company seeks confidential treatment of that present value demonstration, it must be separate from the other filing material and a specific request for confidentiality is required. 

Finally, the NY Insurance Department asks that EIA submissions include a sample sales illustration.  They further indicate that, on a case-by-case basis, marketing material may be requested. 

Health of Insured at Policy Delivery in NY

In several recent policy form reviews, both prior approvals and post-approval reviews, the NYSID has raised an issue that may warrant some investigation of policy delivery practices at your company.  It arises when applications include a statement along the lines that the policy does not take effect unless the insured is insurable or in "good health" at the time the policy is delivered. 

At policy delivery there are two possibilities:  one is that money was collected and a conditional receipt or temporary insurance agreement provided.  The Department's position is that  when a conditional receipt was issued the insured need not be insurable at delivery and so the affirmation in the signature section is not permissible.  The other possibility is that no money was collected at application.  In that instance, a  statement in the base application regarding continued good health status is permissible, but the Department requires that a form such as a "Statement of Good Health" be used at delivery (this must be a filed and approved form) in order to collect information on health status.  

This position is likely to come up in future post-approval reviews, and so companies would be well-advised to review applications approved on a CL6 basis, as well as their actual practices on policy delivery to determine whether they are in compliance with the rules set out above or whether a revision to the form or the filing of a Statement of Good Health should be considered. 

New Policy Form Review Director in MA

Kevin Beagan, Director of the State Rating Bureau of the MA Division, recently announced that Edward Charbonnier has been appointed to the position of Policy Form Review Director, with responsibility of coordinating the staff who review life insurance, annuity and accident and health filing materials.  In addition, Beagan indicated that Policy Forms meetings will resume after being discontinued in October 2007.   It appears that the intent is to hold the meetings on a quarterly basis as they were previously held. 

Regulation of EIAs

This week's edition of Investment News has two articles on the SEC move to regulate equity-indexed annuities (EIAs).  In addition, comments continue to come in on the SEC's website.  

In Sara Hansard's July 14 article in Investment News:  State insurance regulators are angry about EIA proposal, she reports that Susan Voss, Iowa's Insurance Commissioner is scheduled to meet with SEC Chairman Christopher Cox tomorrow to address her concerns.  The SEC's proposed regulation, in a reversal of their 1997 determination that EIAs were insurance products, would regulate EIAs as securities, with the requirement of prospectuses and other federally-mandated disclosures.  In the same July 14 edition, Darla Mercado reports on Agents' concerns over the move by the SEC

That agent concern is certainly evident on the SEC's website where over 50 comments were posted on one day alone last week.  Many of those comments appear to be somewhat emotional reactions and I am hopeful that as we get closer to the deadline for input, there will be comments that reflect well-reasoned positions on the issues raised by this move. The Hansard article indicates that SEC spokesman John Nester stated, via e-mail, that SEC officials "look forward to hearing and considering all views" as the review the proposal.  It also reports that several organizations, including ACLI and NAVA, are still evaluating the proposal.

Mercado reports that agents are concerned about having to affiliate with a broker-dealer and the resulting costs and loss of control they would experience in order to sell EIAs.  Registered reps counter that federal oversight will improve sales standards.  

State regulators are pointing to the new suitability model regulation as a more appropriate vehicle to safeguard insurance consumers.   

Life Insurance Activity Down Slightly in June per MIB

In a July 9 press release, the MIB Life Index reports that U.S. life insurance application activity in June 2008 was off 0.9% when compared to June of 2007. 

Year to date, application activity is down 2.5%% over the same period last year.  Interestingly, while application activity for all ages combined is down 2.9% when the 2Q of 2007 is compared to 2Q 2008, application activity for ages 60+ is up 4.2%.  Looking just at June similar reports are reported with ages 60+  being up 5.1% June-over-June while as indicated above all ages are down 0.9%. 

Single-License Approach

A conference is being held at the American Enterprise Institute tomorrow (7/9/08) on the "Future of Insurance Regulation." Coincidentally, the US House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Insurance is also meeting tomorrow  to mark-up proposals of H.R. 5840, the Insurance Information Act, which would establish an Office of Insurance Information within Treasury, "NARAB II", a national system to process non-resident producer licensing, and the Increasing Insurance Coverage Options for Consumers Act.  

Of course I follow the discussions of federal vs. state regulation of insurance, but one of my frustrations with what I often read and hear is the assertion that federal regulation represents efficiency, with the optional nature of a proposed federal charter representing competition among regulators. State regulation on the other hand is generally presented as immovable and irretrievably mired in inefficiency and insensitivity to competitive demands.   This appears to be the dominant theme at the AEI conference, yet it seems simplistic to me in several ways.   One of them is that when we make such a comparison, we are looking at a system that has yet to be fully conceived versus one that has a very long and complicated history.  Who among us can't dream?  The challenges obviously arise when systems are implemented and develop and are presented with difficult decisions and must draft regulations and deal with real life on both a day-to-day basis and in crisis.  Then inefficiencies and bureaucracies begin to take hold and grow.  I have not yet read or seen any reason why a federal agency would not completely dominate an alternative state system and simultaneously grow to become large and inefficient. 

But there is another option that has been proposed by some that I hear much less about, but which I find very interesting.  This option is called the Single-License Approach to Regulating Insurance and it is discussed in a paper authored by Henry N. Butler, Executive Director of the Searle Center on Law, Regulation and Economic Growth at Northwestern University School of Law and  Larry E. Ribstein, the Mildred van Voorhis Jones Chair in Law at University of Illinois College of Law.  The paper  is available for download at no charge from the Social Science Research Network. 

Continue Reading...

Ario No Longer "Acting Commissioner"

As of July 3, 2008, Joel Ario is now the full and confirmed, by a 50-0 vote, the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania. 

Those of us who do filings in PA, will need to make a change to the address block on submission letters, but since Ario has been Acting Commissioner for a year, not much else is likely to change significantly as a result of this confirmation. 

Ario is one of a small number of insurance commissioners who have served in two states, having been Oregon's Insurance Administrator for 6 years prior to leading the PA Department. 

New Group DI guidance posted on NY's site

The New York State Insurance Department has posted two new Disability Income documents on their website.  There is both a new outline and a new checklist available to assist with making group DI filings in SERFF.  The Department's website indicates that the checklist is interactive with links to the various references cited.  However, when I tried them, the links did not seem to be working.   I was also not able to actually complete the checklist online, but had to print and manually complete it and then scan it to get a pdf that would work for a SERFF filing.   

The Health Bureau's list of available outlines and checklists indicates that many on the group side are in progress.  The Life Bureau has also indicated that they are working on a number of outlines (checklists are no longer being maintained on the life side), so hopefully there will be a significant amount of new and up-to-date NY guidance posted in the coming months! 

Tags:

A little something different for the holiday week

Often when I tell people that my business is life insurance compliance, they look at me with eyes that say they cannot imagine being interested in that!  When I try and explain what it is about this work that I find interesting and challenging, the same unbelieving eyes look back at me.  In this short summer holiday week, I am posting links to two You Tube videos about the exciting field of life insurance. 

While I find them funny, I am not sure that they would convince anyone that life insurance compliance is a fascinating way to spend one's working life!  But if you are reading this blog, I hope you  share my interest and enjoy these videos.  

Fonejacker - Life Insurance

Aniboom - Life Insurance Cartoon

Happy Fourth of July and enjoy the long weekend! 

 

Tags:

IA issues Bulletin on New Viatical Law effective 7/1/08

Today a new law goes into effect regarding viatical and life settlements in Iowa, and the Iowa Insurance Division has issued a bulletin providing a high level discussion of some of the major changes to IA law, with guidance on how the law will be implemented. 

Among other provisions, the new law bans newly defined stranger-initiated life insurance, or coverage initiated for the benefit of a third-party investor who has no insurable interest in the insured.  The law has fraud provisions and gives authority for the Division to conduct on-site examinations of viatical settlement brokers and providers. 

Annual reports from viatical providers are required by the law, the first being due March 1, 2009. 

The Division indicates that while they are reviewing their existing rules, those rules remain in effect unless in direct conflict with the new law.